Capella OnlineApril 2019 Edition
Welcome to the April edition of this newsletter.
Many thanks to Mary McIntyre for last month’s superb talk entitled “Photographing the Milky Way from the UK”. The talk was incredibly popular with lots of new faces.
Mary has kindly put together some notes to follow up from her talk. They can be downloaded here.
I’ve put a new feature on the website. It provides information on the next ISS pass for Stoke on Trent plus a weather forecast.
Even though it didn’t look promising when managed an observing evening! The sky wasn’t ideal but we could see enough and several members set up scopes or cameras and got some results. Success!
The practical evening was also a clear night and several members set up telescopes and cameras outside.
This month’s observing night will be on THURSDAY 4th APRIL depending on the weather.
The next practical workshop is scheduled for Wednesday 17th April . This and any other events are listed on the NSAS Events page.
We have two upcoming talks that may be of interest to you. They are being held on at the Audley Community Centre
May I remind everyone that the society solar scope is available throughout the winter too! It is on a monthly basis and there is just a £25 returnable deposit required. Contact me at the email below or see me at the meeting. More details here
If anyone has any ideas for new features on the website or on any improvements you’d like to see to existing ones then please drop me an email or text.
Also keep an eye on our Facebook page as any breaking news will more than likely appear there first as I can update that from my phone.
Our new members Facebook group is here
The sky maps can be downloaded from here
The next regular meeting is on April 2nd which is the Annual General Meeting.
If anyone has anything they want to include on the website/newsletter/etc then please email me firstname.lastname@example.org
Wishing you clear skies, Duncan
Members Area can be accessed using the login details already provided. Any problems then please email me email@example.com
|1||Moon at apogee (farthest from Earth) at 0h UT (distance 405,577 km; angular size 29.5′).|
|2||Moon near Venus (morning sky) at 7h UT. Mag. −4.0.|
|3||Moon near Mercury (26° from Sun, morning sky) at 2h UT. Mag. 0.8.|
|5||New Moon at 8:51 UT. Start of lunation 1191.|
|8||Moon near the Pleiades (evening sky) at 23h UT.|
|9||Moon near Mars (evening sky) at 10h UT. Mag. 1.5.|
|9||Moon near Aldebaran (evening sky) at 16h UT.|
|11||Mercury at greatest elongation west (28° from Sun, morning sky) at 20h UT. Mag. 0.4.|
|12||First Quarter Moon at 19:05 UT.|
|12||Moon near Pollux (evening sky) at 22h UT.|
|13||Moon near Beehive cluster M44 (evening sky) at 21h UT.|
|15||Mars 6.5° N of Aldebaran (45° from Sun, evening sky) at 1h UT. Mags. 1.6 and 0.9.|
|15||Moon near Regulus (evening sky) at 10h UT.|
|16||Mercury 4.3° E of Venus (30° from Sun, morning sky) at 20h UT. Mags. 0.2 and −3.9.|
|16||Moon at perigee (closest to Earth) at 22:03 UT (364,205 km; angular size 32.8′).|
|19||Moon near Spica (morning sky) at 3h UT.|
|19||Full Moon at 11:11 UT.|
|22||Moon near Antares (morning sky) at 11h UT.|
|23||Lyrid meteor shower peaks at 0h UT. Active April 14-30. Radiant is between Hercules and Lyra. Expect 10 to 20 bright, fast meteors per hour at its peak. Unfortunately, bright moonlight this year means poor viewing conditions.|
|23||Moon near Jupiter (morning sky) at 13h UT. Mag. −2.4.|
|26||Last Quarter Moon at 22:18 UT.|
|25||Moon near Saturn (105° from Sun, morning sky) at 13h UT. Mag. 0.5. Occultation visible from eastern Australia, New Zealand, and western South America.|
|28||Moon at apogee (farthest from Earth) at 18h UT (distance 404,582 km; angular size 29.5′).|
|All times Universal Time (UT).|
CONSTELLATION OF THE MONTH
|Pronunciation||//, genitive //|
|Area||947 sq. deg. (12th)|
|Main stars||9, 15|
|Stars with planets||13|
|Stars brighter than 3.00m||5|
|Stars within 10.00 pc (32.62 ly)||5|
|Brightest star||Regulus (α Leo) (1.35m)|
|Visible at latitudes between +90° and −65°.
Best visible at 21:00 (9 p.m.) during the month of April.
Leo // is one of the constellations of the zodiac, lying between Cancer the crab to the west and Virgo the maiden to the east. Its name is Latin for lion, and to the ancient Greeks represented the Nemean Lion killed by the mythical Greek hero Heracles meaning ‘Glory of Hera’ (known to the ancient Romans as Hercules) as one of his twelve labors. Its symbol is (Unicode ♌). One of the 48 constellations described by the 2nd-century astronomer Ptolemy, Leo remains one of the 88 modern constellations today, and one of the most easily recognizable due to its many bright stars and a distinctive shape that is reminiscent of the crouching lion it depicts. The lion’s mane and shoulders also form an asterism known as “The Sickle,” which to modern observers may resemble a backwards “question mark.”
Leo contains many bright stars, many of which were individually identified by the ancients. There are four stars of first or second magnitude, which render this constellation especially prominent:
- Regulus, designated Alpha Leonis, is a blue-white main-sequence star of magnitude 1.34, 77.5 light-years from Earth. It is a double star divisible in binoculars, with a secondary of magnitude 7.7. Its traditional name (Regulus) means “the little king”.
- Beta Leonis, called Denebola, is at the opposite end of the constellation to Regulus. It is a blue-white star of magnitude 2.23, 36 light-years from Earth. The name Denebola means “the lion’s tail”.
- Algieba, Gamma Leonis, is a binary star with a third optical component; the primary and secondary are divisible in small telescopes and the tertiary is visible in binoculars. The primary is a gold-yellow giant star of magnitude 2.61 and the secondary is similar but at magnitude 3.6; they have a period of 600 years and are 126 light-years from Earth. The unrelated tertiary, 40 Leonis, is a yellow-tinged star of magnitude 4.8. Its traditional name, Algieba, means “the forehead”.
- Delta Leonis, called Zosma, is a blue-white star of magnitude 2.58, 58 light-years from Earth.
- Epsilon Leonis is a yellow giant of magnitude 3.0, 251 light-years from Earth.
- Zeta Leonis, called Adhafera, is an optical triple star. The brightest and only star designated Zeta Leonis, is a white giant star of magnitude 3.65, 260 light-years from Earth. The second-brightest, 39 Leonis, is widely spaced to the south and of magnitude 5.8. 35 Leonis is to the north and of magnitude 6.0.
- Iota Leonis is a binary star divisible in medium amateur telescopes; they are divisible in small amateur telescopes at their widest in the years 2053–2063. To the unaided eye, Iota Leonis appears to be a yellow-tinged star of magnitude 4.0. The system, 79 light-years from Earth, has components of magnitude 4.1 and 6.7 with a period of 183 years.
- Tau Leonis is a double star visible in binoculars. The primary is a yellow giant of magnitude 5.0, 621 light-years from Earth. The secondary is a star of magnitude 8. 54 Leonis is a binary star 289 light-years from Earth, divisible in small telescopes. The primary is a blue-white star of magnitude 4.5 and the secondary is a blue-white star of magnitude 6.3.
Leo is also home to one bright variable star, the red giant R Leonis. It is a Mira variable with a minimum magnitude of 10 and normal maximum magnitude of 6; it periodically brightens to magnitude 4.4. R Leonis, 330 light-years from Earth, has a period of 310 days and a diameter of 450 solar diameters.
The star Wolf 359 (CN Leonis), one of the nearest stars to Earth at 7.8 light-years away, is in Leo. Wolf 359 is a red dwarf of magnitude 13.5; it periodically brightens by one magnitude or less because it is a flare star. Gliese 436, a faint star in Leo about 33 light-years away from the Sun, is orbited by a transiting Neptune-mass extrasolar planet.
The star SDSS J102915+172927 (Caffau’s star) is a population II star in the galactic halo seen in Leo. It is about 13 billion years old, making it one of the oldest stars in the Galaxy. It has the lowest metallicity of any known star.
Modern astronomers, including Tycho Brahe in 1602, excised a group of stars that once made up the “tuft” of the lion’s tail and used them to form the new constellation Coma Berenices (Berenice’s hair), although there was precedent for that designation among the ancient Greeks and Romans.
The Leo Ring, a cloud of hydrogen, helium gas, is found in orbit of two galaxies found within this constellation.
M66 is a spiral galaxy that is part of the Leo Triplet, whose other two members are M65 and NGC 3628. It is at a distance of 37 million light-years and has a somewhat distorted shape due to gravitational interactions with the other members of the Triplet, which are pulling stars away from M66. Eventually, the outermost stars may form a dwarf galaxy orbiting M66. Both M65 and M66 are visible in large binoculars or small telescopes, but their concentrated nuclei and elongation are only visible in large amateur instruments.
M95 and M96 are both spiral galaxies 20 million light-years from Earth. Though they are visible as fuzzy objects in small telescopes, their structure is only visible in larger instruments. M95 is a barred spiral galaxy. M105 is about a degree away from the M95/M96 pair; it is an elliptical galaxy of the 9th magnitude, also about 20 million light-years from Earth.
NGC 2903 is a barred spiral galaxy discovered by William Herschel in 1784. It is very similar in size and shape to the Milky Way and is located 25 million light-years from Earth. In its core, NGC 2903 has many “hotspots”, which have been found to be near regions of star formation. The star formation in this region is thought to be due to the presence of the dusty bar, which sends shock waves through its rotation to an area with a diameter of 2,000 light-years. The outskirts of the galaxy have many young open clusters.
Leo is also home to some of the largest structures in the observable universe. Some of the structures found in the constellation are the Clowes–Campusano LQG, U1.11, U1.54, and the Huge-LQG, which are all large quasar groups; the latter being the second largest structure known (see also NQ2-NQ4 GRB overdensity).
The Leonids occur in November, peaking on November 14–15, and have a radiant close to Gamma Leonis. Its parent body is Comet Tempel-Tuttle, which causes significant outbursts every 35 years. The normal peak rate is approximately 10 meteors per hour.
History and mythology
Leo was one of the earliest recognized constellations, with archaeological evidence that the Mesopotamians had a similar constellation as early as 4000 BCE. The Persians called Leo Ser or Shir; the Turks, Artan; the Syrians, Aryo; the Jews, Arye; the Indians, Simha, all meaning “lion”.
In Babylonian astronomy, the constellation was called UR.GU.LA, the “Great Lion”; the bright star Regulus was known as “the star that stands at the Lion’s breast.” Regulus also had distinctly regal associations, as it was known as the King Star.
In Greek mythology, Leo was identified as the Nemean Lion which was killed by Heracles (Hercules to the Romans) during the first of his twelve labours. The Nemean Lion would take women as hostages to its lair in a cave, luring warriors from nearby towns to save the damsel in distress, to their misfortune. The Lion was impervious to any weaponry; thus, the warriors’ clubs, swords, and spears were rendered useless against it. Realizing that he must defeat the Lion with his bare hands, Hercules slipped into the Lion’s cave and engaged it at close quarters. When the Lion pounced, Hercules caught it in midair, one hand grasping the Lion’s forelegs and the other its hind legs, and bent it backwards, breaking its back and freeing the trapped maidens. Zeus commemorated this labor by placing the Lion in the sky.
The Roman poet Ovid called it Herculeus Leo and Violentus Leo. Bacchi Sidus (star of Bacchus) was another of its titles, the god Bacchus always being identified with this animal. However, Manilius called it Jovis et Junonis Sidus(Star of Jupiter and Juno).
As of 2002, the Sun appears in the constellation Leo from August 10 to September 10. In tropical astrology, the Sun is considered to be in the sign Leo from July 23 to August 22, and in sidereal astrology, from August 16 to September 17.
Leo is commonly represented as if the sickle-shaped asterism of stars is the back of the Lion’s head. The sickle is marked by six stars: Epsilon Leonis, Mu Leonis, Zeta Leonis, Gamma Leonis, Eta Leonis, and Alpha Leonis. The lion’s tail is marked by Beta Leonis (Denebola) and the rest of his body is delineated by Delta Leonis and Theta Leonis.
H.A. Rey has suggested an alternative way to connect the stars, which graphically shows a lion walking. The stars delta Leonis, gamma Leonis, eta Leonis, and theta Leonis form the body of the lion, with gamma Leonis being of the second magnitude and delta Leonis and theta Leonis being of the third magnitude. The stars gamma Leonis, zeta Leonis, mu Leonis, epsilon Leonis, and eta Leonis form the lion’s neck, with epsilon Leonis being of the third magnitude. The stars mu Leonis, kappa Leonis, lambda Leonis, and epsilon Leonis form the head of the lion. Delta Leonis and beta Leonis form the lion’s tail: beta Leonis, also known as Denebola, is the bright tip of the tail with a magnitude of two. The stars theta Leonis, iota Leonis, and sigma Leonis form the left hind leg of the lion, with sigma Leonis being the foot. The stars theta Leonis and rho Leonis form the right hind leg, with rho Leonis being the foot. The stars eta Leonis and Alpha Leonis mark the lion’s heart, with alpha Leonis, also known as Regulus, being the bright star of magnitude one. The stars eta Leonis and omicron Leonis form the right front foot of the Lion.
- Ridpath & Tirion 2001, pp. 166-168.
- “Leo”. Constellationsofwords.com. Retrieved 2016-01-19.
- “Astronomers discover smallest “exoplanets” yet”. Toronto. Archived from the original on January 16, 2009.
- L. Phil Simpson (Springer 2012) Guidebook to the Constellations: Telescopic Sights, Tales, and Myths, p. 235 (ISBN 9781441969415).
- Wilkins, Jamie; Dunn, Robert (2006). 300 Astronomical Objects: A Visual Reference to the Universe. Buffalo, New York: Firefly Books. ISBN 978-1-55407-175-3.
- Prostak, Sergio (11 January 2013). “Universe’s Largest Structure Discovered”. scinews.com. Retrieved 15 January2013.
- Ridpath & Tirion 2001, pp. 166-167.
- Jenniskens, Peter (September 2011). “Mapping Meteoroid Orbits: New Meteor Showers Discovered”. Sky & Telescope: 24.
- Pasachoff, Jay M. (2006). Stars and Planets. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 9780395537596.
- Tamra Andrews (Oxford University Press 2000) Dictionary of Nature Myths: Legends of the Earth, Sea, and Sky (ISBN 9780195136777).
- Babylonian Star-lore by Gavin White, Solaria Publications, 2008 page 140, ISBN 978-0955903700
- Janet Parker; et al., eds. (2007). Mythology: Myths, Legends and Fantasies. Struik. pp. 121–122. ISBN 9781770074538.
- H. A. Rey, The Stars — A New Way To See Them. Enlarged World-Wide Edition. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1997. ISBN 0-395-24830-2.
- Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning, by Richard Allen Hinckley, Dover. ISBN 0-486-21079-0
- Ridpath, Ian; Tirion, Wil (2001), Stars and Planets Guide, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-08913-2
- Ian Ridpath and Wil Tirion (2007). Stars and Planets Guide, Collins, London. ISBN 978-0-00-725120-9. Princeton University Press, Princeton. ISBN 978-0-691-13556-4.
- Dictionary of Symbols, by Carl G. Liungman, W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-31236-4
SOLAR SYSTEM FEATURE OF THE MONTH
|Discovered by||Galileo Galilei|
|Discovery date||8 January 1610|
|Periapsis||420000 km (0.002807 AU)|
|Apoapsis||423400 km (0.002830 AU)|
Mean orbit radius
|421700 km (0.002819 AU)|
|1.769137786 d(152853.5047 s, 42.45930686 h)|
Average orbital speed
|Inclination||0.05° (to Jupiter’s equator)
2.213° (to the ecliptic)
|Dimensions||3,660.0 × 3,637.4 × 3,630.6 km|
|1821.6±0.5 km (0.286 Earths)|
|41910000 km2 (0.082 Earths)|
|Volume||2.53×1010 km3 (0.023 Earths)|
|Mass||(8.931938±0.000018)×1022 kg(0.015 Earths)|
|1.796 m/s2 (0.183 g)|
Equatorial rotation velocity
|5 to 40 nbar|
|Composition by volume||90% sulfur dioxide|
Io (Jupiter I) is the innermost of the four Galilean moons of the planet Jupiter. It is the fourth-largest moon, has the highest density of all the moons, and has the least amount of water of any known astronomical object in the Solar System. It was discovered in 1610 and was named after the mythological character Io, a priestess of Hera who became one of Zeus‘ lovers.
With over 400 active volcanoes, Io is the most geologically active object in the Solar System. This extreme geologic activity is the result of tidal heating from friction generated within Io’s interior as it is pulled between Jupiter and the other Galilean satellites—Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. Several volcanoes produce plumes of sulfur and sulfur dioxide that climb as high as 500 km (300 mi) above the surface. Io’s surface is also dotted with more than 100 mountains that have been uplifted by extensive compression at the base of Io’s silicate crust. Some of these peaks are taller than Mount Everest. Unlike most satellites in the outer Solar System, which are mostly composed of water ice, Io is primarily composed of silicate rock surrounding a molten iron or iron-sulfide core. Most of Io’s surface is composed of extensive plains coated with sulfur and sulfur-dioxide frost.
Io’s volcanism is responsible for many of its unique features. Its volcanic plumes and lava flows produce large surface changes and paint the surface in various subtle shades of yellow, red, white, black, and green, largely due to allotropes and compounds of sulfur. Numerous extensive lava flows, several more than 500 km (300 mi) in length, also mark the surface. The materials produced by this volcanism make up Io’s thin, patchy atmosphere and Jupiter’s extensive magnetosphere. Io’s volcanic ejecta also produce a large plasma torus around Jupiter.
Io played a significant role in the development of astronomy in the 17th and 18th centuries. It was discovered in January 1610 by Galileo Galilei, along with the other Galilean satellites. This discovery furthered the adoption of the Copernican model of the Solar System, the development of Kepler’s laws of motion, and the first measurement of the speed of light. From Earth, Io remained just a point of light until the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when it became possible to resolve its large-scale surface features, such as the dark red polar and bright equatorial regions. In 1979, the two Voyager spacecraft revealed Io to be a geologically active world, with numerous volcanic features, large mountains, and a young surface with no obvious impact craters. The Galileo spacecraft performed several close flybys in the 1990s and early 2000s, obtaining data about Io’s interior structure and surface composition. These spacecraft also revealed the relationship between Io and Jupiter’s magnetosphere and the existence of a belt of high-energy radiation centered on Io’s orbit. Io receives about 3,600 rem (36 Sv) of ionizing radiation per day.
Although Simon Marius is not credited with the sole discovery of the Galilean satellites, his names for the moons were adopted. In his 1614 publication Mundus Iovialis anno M.DC.IX Detectus Ope Perspicilli Belgici, he proposed several alternative names for the innermost of the large moons of Jupiter, including “The Mercury of Jupiter” and “The First of the Jovian Planets”. Based on a suggestion from Johannes Kepler in October 1613, he also devised a naming scheme whereby each moon was named for a lover of the Greek mythological Zeus or his Roman equivalent, Jupiter. He named the innermost large moon of Jupiter after the Greek mythological figure Io. Marius’ names were not widely adopted until centuries later (mid-20th century). In much of the earlier astronomical literature, Io was generally referred to by its Roman numeral designation (a system introduced by Galileo) as “Jupiter I“, or as “the first satellite of Jupiter”.
Features on Io are named after characters and places from the Io myth, as well as deities of fire, volcanoes, the Sun, and thunder from various myths, and characters and places from Dante’s Inferno: names appropriate to the volcanic nature of the surface. Since the surface was first seen up close by Voyager 1, the International Astronomical Union has approved 225 names for Io’s volcanoes, mountains, plateaus, and large albedo features. The approved feature categories used for Io for different types of volcanic features include patera (“saucer”; volcanic depression), fluctus (“flow”; lava flow), vallis (“valley”; lava channel), and active eruptive center (location where plume activity was the first sign of volcanic activity at a particular volcano). Named mountains, plateaus, layered terrain, and shield volcanoes include the terms mons, mensa (“table”), planum, and tholus (“rotunda”), respectively. Named, bright albedo regions use the term regio. Examples of named features are Prometheus, Pan Mensa, Tvashtar Paterae, and Tsũi Goab Fluctus.
The first reported observation of Io was made by Galileo Galilei on 7 January 1610 using a 20x-power, refracting telescope at the University of Padua. However, in that observation, Galileo could not separate Io and Europa due to the low power of his telescope, so the two were recorded as a single point of light. Io and Europa were seen for the first time as separate bodies during Galileo’s observations of the Jovian system the following day, 8 January 1610 (used as the discovery date for Io by the IAU). The discovery of Io and the other Galilean satellites of Jupiter was published in Galileo’s Sidereus Nuncius in March 1610. In his Mundus Jovialis, published in 1614, Simon Marius claimed to have discovered Io and the other moons of Jupiter in 1609, one week before Galileo’s discovery. Galileo doubted this claim and dismissed the work of Marius as plagiarism. Regardless, Marius’ first recorded observation came from 29 December 1609 in the Julian calendar, which equates to 8 January 1610 in the Gregorian calendar, which Galileo used. Given that Galileo published his work before Marius, Galileo is credited with the discovery.
For the next two and a half centuries, Io remained an unresolved, 5th-magnitude point of light in astronomers’ telescopes. During the 17th century, Io and the other Galilean satellites served a variety of purposes, including early methods to determine longitude, validating Kepler’s third law of planetary motion, and determining the time required for light to travel between Jupiter and Earth. Based on ephemerides produced by astronomer Giovanni Cassini and others, Pierre-Simon Laplace created a mathematical theory to explain the resonant orbits of Io, Europa, and Ganymede. This resonance was later found to have a profound effect on the geologies of the three moons.
Improved telescope technology in the late 19th and 20th centuries allowed astronomers to resolve (that is, see as distinct objects) large-scale surface features on Io. In the 1890s, Edward E. Barnard was the first to observe variations in Io’s brightness between its equatorial and polar regions, correctly determining that this was due to differences in color and albedo between the two regions and not due to Io being egg-shaped, as proposed at the time by fellow astronomer William Pickering, or two separate objects, as initially proposed by Barnard. Later telescopic observations confirmed Io’s distinct reddish-brown polar regions and yellow-white equatorial band.
Telescopic observations in the mid-20th century began to hint at Io’s unusual nature. Spectroscopic observations suggested that Io’s surface was devoid of water ice (a substance found to be plentiful on the other Galilean satellites). The same observations suggested a surface dominated by evaporates composed of sodium salts and sulfur. Radiotelescopic observations revealed Io’s influence on the Jovian magnetosphere, as demonstrated by decametric wavelength bursts tied to the orbital period of Io.
The first spacecraft to pass by Io were the Pioneer 10 and 11 probes on 3 December 1973 and 2 December 1974, respectively. Radio tracking provided an improved estimate of Io’s mass, which, along with the best available information of its size, suggested it had the highest density of the Galilean satellites, and was composed primarily of silicate rock rather than water ice. The Pioneers also revealed the presence of a thin atmosphere and intense radiation belts near the orbit of Io. The camera on board Pioneer 11 took the only good image of the moon obtained by either spacecraft, showing its north polar region. Close-up images were planned during Pioneer 10‘s encounter, but those were lost because of the high-radiation environment.
When the twin probes Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 passed by Io in 1979, their more advanced imaging system allowed for far more detailed images. Voyager 1 flew past Io on 5 March 1979 from a distance of 20,600 km (12,800 mi). The images returned during the approach revealed a strange, multi-colored landscape devoid of impact craters. The highest-resolution images showed a relatively young surface punctuated by oddly shaped pits, mountains taller than Mount Everest, and features resembling volcanic lava flows.
Shortly after the encounter, Voyager navigation engineer Linda A. Morabito noticed a plume emanating from the surface in one of the images. Analysis of other Voyager 1 images showed nine such plumes scattered across the surface, proving that Io was volcanically active. This conclusion was predicted in a paper published shortly before the Voyager 1 encounter by Stan Peale, Patrick Cassen, and R. T. Reynolds. The authors calculated that Io’s interior must experience significant tidal heating caused by its orbital resonance with Europa and Ganymede (see the “Tidal heating” section for a more detailed explanation of the process). Data from this flyby showed that the surface of Io is dominated by sulfur and sulfur dioxide frosts. These compounds also dominate its thin atmosphere and the torus of plasma centered on Io’s orbit (also discovered by Voyager).
Voyager 2 passed Io on 9 July 1979 at a distance of 1,130,000 km (702,000 mi). Though it did not approach nearly as close as Voyager 1, comparisons between images taken by the two spacecraft showed several surface changes that had occurred in the four months between the encounters. In addition, observations of Io as a crescent as Voyager 2 departed the Jovian system revealed that seven of the nine plumes observed in March were still active in July 1979, with only the volcano Pele shutting down between flybys.
The Galileo spacecraft arrived at Jupiter in 1995 after a six-year journey from Earth to follow up on the discoveries of the two Voyager probes and ground-based observations taken in the intervening years. Io’s location within one of Jupiter’s most intense radiation belts precluded a prolonged close flyby, but Galileo did pass close by shortly before entering orbit for its two-year, primary mission studying the Jovian system. Although no images were taken during the close flyby on 7 December 1995, the encounter did yield significant results, such as the discovery of a large iron core, similar to that found in the rocky planets of the inner Solar System.
Despite the lack of close-up imaging and mechanical problems that greatly restricted the amount of data returned, several significant discoveries were made during Galileo‘s primary mission. Galileo observed the effects of a major eruption at Pillan Patera and confirmed that volcanic eruptions are composed of silicate magmas with magnesium-rich mafic and ultramafic compositions. Distant imaging of Io was acquired for almost every orbit during the primary mission, revealing large numbers of active volcanoes (both thermal emission from cooling magma on the surface and volcanic plumes), numerous mountains with widely varying morphologies, and several surface changes that had taken place both between the Voyager and Galileo eras and between Galileo orbits.
The Galileo mission was twice extended, in 1997 and 2000. During these extended missions, the probe flew by Io three times in late 1999 and early 2000 and three times in late 2001 and early 2002. Observations during these encounters revealed the geologic processes occurring at Io’s volcanoes and mountains, excluded the presence of a magnetic field, and demonstrated the extent of volcanic activity. In December 2000, the Cassini spacecraft had a distant and brief encounter with the Jovian system en route to Saturn, allowing for joint observations with Galileo. These observations revealed a new plume at Tvashtar Paterae and provided insights into Io’s aurorae.
Following Galileo‘s planned destruction in Jupiter’s atmosphere in September 2003, new observations of Io’s volcanism came from Earth-based telescopes. In particular, adaptive optics imaging from the Keck telescope in Hawaii and imaging from the Hubble telescope have allowed astronomers to monitor Io’s active volcanoes. This imaging has allowed scientists to monitor volcanic activity on Io, even without a spacecraft in the Jovian system.
The New Horizons spacecraft, en route to Pluto and the Kuiper belt, flew by the Jovian system and Io on 28 February 2007. During the encounter, numerous distant observations of Io were obtained. These included images of a large plume at Tvashtar, providing the first detailed observations of the largest class of Ionian volcanic plume since observations of Pele’s plume in 1979. New Horizons also captured images of a volcano near Girru Patera in the early stages of an eruption, and several volcanic eruptions that have occurred since Galileo.
There is one current and one forthcoming mission planned for the Jovian system. Juno, launched on 5 August 2011, has limited imaging capabilities, but it could monitor Io’s volcanic activity using its near-infrared spectrometer, JIRAM. The Jupiter Icy Moon Explorer (JUICE) is a planned European Space Agency mission to the Jovian system that is intended to end up in Ganymede orbit. JUICE has a launch scheduled for 2022, with arrival at Jupiter planned for January 2030. JUICE will not fly by Io, but it will use its instruments, such as a narrow-angle camera, to monitor Io’s volcanic activity and measure its surface composition during the two-year Jupiter-tour phase of the mission prior to Ganymede orbit insertion. The Io Volcano Observer (IVO) is a proposal for a Discovery-class mission that would launch in 2021. It would involve multiple flybys of Io while in orbit around Jupiter beginning in 2026.
Orbit and rotation
Io orbits Jupiter at a distance of 421,700 km (262,000 mi) from Jupiter’s center and 350,000 km (217,000 mi) from its cloudtops. It is the innermost of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter, its orbit lying between those of Thebe and Europa. Including Jupiter’s inner satellites, Io is the fifth moon out from Jupiter. It takes Io about 42.5 hours to complete one orbit around Jupiter (fast enough for its motion to be observed over a single night of observation). Io is in a 2:1 mean-motion orbital resonance with Europa and a 4:1 mean-motion orbital resonance with Ganymede, completing two orbits of Jupiter for every one orbit completed by Europa, and four orbits for every one completed by Ganymede. This resonance helps maintain Io’s orbital eccentricity (0.0041), which in turn provides the primary heating source for its geologic activity. Without this forced eccentricity, Io’s orbit would circularize through tidal dissipation, leading to a geologically less active world.
Like the other Galilean satellites and the Moon, Io rotates synchronously with its orbital period, keeping one face nearly pointed toward Jupiter. This synchrony provides the definition for Io’s longitude system. Io’s prime meridian intersects the equator at the sub-Jovian point. The side of Io that always faces Jupiter is known as the subjovian hemisphere, whereas the side that always faces away is known as the antijovian hemisphere. The side of Io that always faces in the direction that Io travels in its orbit is known as the leading hemisphere, whereas the side that always faces in the opposite direction is known as the trailing hemisphere.
From the surface of Io, Jupiter would subtend an arc of 19.5°, making Jupiter appear 39 times the apparent diameter of our Moon.
Interaction with Jupiter’s magnetosphere
Io plays a significant role in shaping Jupiter’s magnetic field, acting as an electric generator that can develop 400,000 volts across itself and create an electric current of 3 million amperes, releasing ions that give Jupiter a magnetic field inflated to more than twice the size it would otherwise have. The magnetosphere of Jupiter sweeps up gases and dust from Io’s thin atmosphere at a rate of 1 tonne per second. This material is mostly composed of ionized and atomic sulfur, oxygen and chlorine; atomic sodium and potassium; molecular sulfur dioxide and sulfur; and sodium chloride dust. These materials originate from Io’s volcanic activity, but the material that escapes to Jupiter’s magnetic field and into interplanetary space comes directly from Io’s atmosphere. These materials, depending on their ionized state and composition, end up in various neutral (non-ionized) clouds and radiation belts in Jupiter’s magnetosphere and, in some cases, are eventually ejected from the Jovian system.
Surrounding Io (at a distance of up to six Io radii from its surface) is a cloud of neutral sulfur, oxygen, sodium, and potassium atoms. These particles originate in Io’s upper atmosphere and are excited by collisions with ions in the plasma torus (discussed below) and by other processes into filling Io’s Hill sphere, which is the region where Io’s gravity is dominant over Jupiter’s. Some of this material escapes Io’s gravitational pull and goes into orbit around Jupiter. Over a 20-hour period, these particles spread out from Io to form a banana-shaped, neutral cloud that can reach as far as six Jovian radii from Io, either inside Io’s orbit and ahead of it or outside Io’s orbit and behind it. The collision process that excites these particles also occasionally provides sodium ions in the plasma torus with an electron, removing those new “fast” neutrals from the torus. These particles retain their velocity (70 km/s, compared to the 17 km/s orbital velocity at Io), and are thus ejected in jets leading away from Io.
Io orbits within a belt of intense radiation known as the Io plasma torus. The plasma in this doughnut-shaped ring of ionized sulfur, oxygen, sodium, and chlorine originates when neutral atoms in the “cloud” surrounding Io are ionized and carried along by the Jovian magnetosphere. Unlike the particles in the neutral cloud, these particles co-rotate with Jupiter’s magnetosphere, revolving around Jupiter at 74 km/s. Like the rest of Jupiter’s magnetic field, the plasma torus is tilted with respect to Jupiter’s equator (and Io’s orbital plane), so that Io is at times below and at other times above the core of the plasma torus. As noted above, these ions’ higher velocity and energy levels are partly responsible for the removal of neutral atoms and molecules from Io’s atmosphere and more extended neutral cloud. The torus is composed of three sections: an outer, “warm” torus that resides just outside Io’s orbit; a vertically extended region known as the “ribbon”, composed of the neutral source region and cooling plasma, located at around Io’s distance from Jupiter; and an inner, “cold” torus, composed of particles that are slowly spiraling in toward Jupiter. After residing an average of 40 days in the torus, particles in the “warm” torus escape and are partially responsible for Jupiter’s unusually large magnetosphere, their outward pressure inflating it from within. Particles from Io, detected as variations in magnetospheric plasma, have been detected far into the long magnetotail by New Horizons. To study similar variations within the plasma torus, researchers measure the ultraviolet light it emits. Although such variations have not been definitively linked to variations in Io’s volcanic activity (the ultimate source for material in the plasma torus), this link has been established in the neutral sodium cloud.
During an encounter with Jupiter in 1992, the Ulysses spacecraft detected a stream of dust-sized particles being ejected from the Jovian system. The dust in these discrete streams travels away from Jupiter at speeds upwards of several hundred kilometres per second, has an average particle size of 10 μm, and consists primarily of sodium chloride. Dust measurements by Galileo showed that these dust streams originate from Io, but exactly how these form, whether from Io’s volcanic activity or material removed from the surface, is unknown.
Jupiter’s magnetic field lines, which Io crosses, couple Io’s atmosphere and neutral cloud to Jupiter’s polar upper atmosphere by generating an electric current known as the Io flux tube. This current produces an auroral glow in Jupiter’s polar regions known as the Io footprint, as well as aurorae in Io’s atmosphere. Particles from this auroral interaction darken the Jovian polar regions at visible wavelengths. The location of Io and its auroral footprint with respect to Earth and Jupiter has a strong influence on Jovian radio emissions from our vantage point: when Io is visible, radio signals from Jupiter increase considerably. The Juno mission, currently in orbit around Jupiter, should help to shed light on these processes. The Jovian magnetic field lines that do get past Io’s ionosphere also induce an electric current, which in turn creates an induced magnetic field within Io’s interior. Io’s induced magnetic field is thought to be generated within a partially molten, silicate magma ocean 50 kilometers beneath Io’s surface. Similar induced fields were found at the other Galilean satellites by Galileo, generated within liquid water oceans in the interiors of those moons.
Io is slightly larger than Earth’s Moon. It has a mean radius of 1,821.3 km (1,131.7 mi) (about 5% greater than the Moon’s) and a mass of 8.9319×1022 kg (about 21% greater than the Moon’s). It is a slight ellipsoid in shape, with its longest axis directed toward Jupiter. Among the Galilean satellites, in both mass and volume, Io ranks behind Ganymede and Callisto but ahead of Europa.
Composed primarily of silicate rock and iron, Io is closer in bulk composition to the terrestrial planets than to other satellites in the outer Solar System, which are mostly composed of a mix of water ice and silicates. Io has a density of 3.5275 g/cm3, the highest of any moon in the Solar System; significantly higher than the other Galilean satellites (Ganymede and Callisto in particular, whose densities are around 1.9 g/cm3) and slightly higher (~5.5%) than the Moon’s 3.344 g/cm3. Models based on the Voyager and Galileo measurements of Io’s mass, radius, and quadrupole gravitational coefficients (numerical values related to how mass is distributed within an object) suggest that its interior is differentiated between a silicate-rich crust and mantle and an iron- or iron-sulfide-rich core. Io’s metallic core makes up approximately 20% of its mass. Depending on the amount of sulfur in the core, the core has a radius between 350 and 650 km (220–400 mi) if it is composed almost entirely of iron, or between 550 and 900 km (340–560 mi) for a core consisting of a mix of iron and sulfur. Galileo‘s magnetometer failed to detect an internal, intrinsic magnetic field at Io, suggesting that the core is not convecting.
Modeling of Io’s interior composition suggests that the mantle is composed of at least 75% of the magnesium-rich mineral forsterite, and has a bulk composition similar to that of L-chondrite and LL-chondrite meteorites, with higher iron content (compared to silicon) than the Moon or Earth, but lower than Mars. To support the heat flow observed on Io, 10–20% of Io’s mantle may be molten, though regions where high-temperature volcanism has been observed may have higher melt fractions. However, re-analysis of Galileo magnetometer data in 2009 revealed the presence of an induced magnetic field at Io, requiring a magma ocean 50 km (31 mi) below the surface.Further analysis published in 2011 provided direct evidence of such an ocean. This layer is estimated to be 50 km thick and to make up about 10% of Io’s mantle. It is estimated that the temperature in the magma ocean reaches 1,200 °C. It is not known if the 10–20% partial melting percentage for Io’s mantle is consistent with the requirement for a significant amount of molten silicates in this possible magma ocean. The lithosphere of Io, composed of basalt and sulfur deposited by Io’s extensive volcanism, is at least 12 km (7 mi) thick, and likely less than 40 km (25 mi) thick.
Unlike Earth and the Moon, Io’s main source of internal heat comes from tidal dissipation rather than radioactive isotope decay, the result of Io’s orbital resonance with Europa and Ganymede. Such heating is dependent on Io’s distance from Jupiter, its orbital eccentricity, the composition of its interior, and its physical state. Its Laplace resonance with Europa and Ganymede maintains Io’s eccentricity and prevents tidal dissipation within Io from circularizing its orbit. The resonant orbit also helps to maintain Io’s distance from Jupiter; otherwise tides raised on Jupiter would cause Io to slowly spiral outward from its parent planet. The vertical differences in Io’s tidal bulge, between the times Io is at periapsis and apoapsis in its orbit, could be as much as 100 m (330 ft). The friction or tidal dissipation produced in Io’s interior due to this varying tidal pull, which, without the resonant orbit, would have gone into circularizing Io’s orbit instead, creates significant tidal heating within Io’s interior, melting a significant amount of Io’s mantle and core. The amount of energy produced is up to 200 times greater than that produced solely from radioactive decay. This heat is released in the form of volcanic activity, generating its observed high heat flow (global total: 0.6 to 1.6×1014 W). Models of its orbit suggest that the amount of tidal heating within Io changes with time; however, the current amount of tidal dissipation is consistent with the observed heat flow. Models of tidal heating and convection have not found consistent planetary viscosity profiles that simultaneously match tidal energy dissipation and mantle convection of heat to the surface.
Although there is general agreement that the origin of the heat as manifested in Io’s many volcanoes is tidal heating from the pull of gravity from Jupiter and its moon Europa, the volcanoes are not in the positions predicted with tidal heating. They are shifted 30 to 60 degrees to the east. A study published by Tyler et al. (2015) suggests that this eastern shift may be caused by an ocean of molten rock under the surface. The movement of this magma would generate extra heat through friction due to its viscosity. The study’s authors believe that this subsurface ocean is a mixture of molten and solid rock.
Other moons in the Solar System are also tidally heated, and they too may generate additional heat through the friction of subsurface magma or water oceans. This ability to generate heat in a subsurface ocean increases the chance of life on bodies like Europa and Enceladus.
Based on their experience with the ancient surfaces of the Moon, Mars, and Mercury, scientists expected to see numerous impact craters in Voyager 1‘s first images of Io. The density of impact craters across Io’s surface would have given clues to Io’s age. However, they were surprised to discover that the surface was almost completely lacking in impact craters, but was instead covered in smooth plains dotted with tall mountains, pits of various shapes and sizes, and volcanic lava flows. Compared to most worlds observed to that point, Io’s surface was covered in a variety of colorful materials (leading Io to be compared to a rotten orange or to pizza) from various sulfurous compounds. The lack of impact craters indicated that Io’s surface is geologically young, like the terrestrial surface; volcanic materials continuously bury craters as they are produced. This result was spectacularly confirmed as at least nine active volcanoes were observed by Voyager 1.
Io’s colorful appearance is the result of materials deposited by its extensive volcanism, including silicates (such as orthopyroxene), sulfur, and sulfur dioxide. Sulfur dioxide frost is ubiquitous across the surface of Io, forming large regions covered in white or grey materials. Sulfur is also seen in many places across Io, forming yellow to yellow-green regions. Sulfur deposited in the mid-latitude and polar regions is often damaged by radiation, breaking up the normally stable cyclic 8-chain sulfur. This radiation damage produces Io’s red-brown polar regions.
Explosive volcanism, often taking the form of umbrella-shaped plumes, paints the surface with sulfurous and silicate materials. Plume deposits on Io are often colored red or white depending on the amount of sulfur and sulfur dioxide in the plume. Generally, plumes formed at volcanic vents from degassing lava contain a greater amount of S
2, producing a red “fan” deposit, or in extreme cases, large (often reaching beyond 450 km or 280 mi from the central vent) red rings. A prominent example of a red-ring plume deposit is located at Pele. These red deposits consist primarily of sulfur (generally 3- and 4-chain molecular sulfur), sulfur dioxide, and perhaps sulfuryl chloride. Plumes formed at the margins of silicate lava flows (through the interaction of lava and pre-existing deposits of sulfur and sulfur dioxide) produce white or gray deposits.
Compositional mapping and Io’s high density suggest that Io contains little to no water, though small pockets of water ice or hydrated minerals have been tentatively identified, most notably on the northwest flank of the mountain Gish Bar Mons. Io has the least amount of water of any known body in the Solar System. This lack of water is likely due to Jupiter being hot enough early in the evolution of the Solar System to drive off volatile materials like water in the vicinity of Io, but not hot enough to do so farther out.
The tidal heating produced by Io’s forced orbital eccentricity has made it the most volcanically active world in the Solar System, with hundreds of volcanic centres and extensive lava flows. During a major eruption, lava flows tens or even hundreds of kilometres long can be produced, consisting mostly of basalt silicate lavas with either mafic or ultramafic (magnesium-rich) compositions. As a by-product of this activity, sulfur, sulfur dioxide gas and silicate pyroclastic material (like ash) are blown up to 200 km (120 mi) into space, producing large, umbrella-shaped plumes, painting the surrounding terrain in red, black, and white, and providing material for Io’s patchy atmosphere and Jupiter’s extensive magnetosphere.
Io’s surface is dotted with volcanic depressions known as paterae which generally have flat floors bounded by steep walls. These features resemble terrestrial calderas, but it is unknown if they are produced through collapse over an emptied lava chamber like their terrestrial cousins. One hypothesis suggests that these features are produced through the exhumation of volcanic sills, and the overlying material is either blasted out or integrated into the sill. Examples of paterae in various stages of exhumation have been mapped using Galileo images of the Chaac-Camaxtli region. Unlike similar features on Earth and Mars, these depressions generally do not lie at the peak of shield volcanoes and are normally larger, with an average diameter of 41 km (25 mi), the largest being Loki Patera at 202 km (126 mi). Loki is also consistently the strongest volcano on Io, contributing on average 25% of Io’s global heat output. Whatever the formation mechanism, the morphology and distribution of many paterae suggest that these features are structurally controlled, with at least half bounded by faults or mountains. These features are often the site of volcanic eruptions, either from lava flows spreading across the floors of the paterae, as at an eruption at Gish Bar Patera in 2001, or in the form of a lava lake. Lava lakes on Io either have a continuously overturning lava crust, such as at Pele, or an episodically overturning crust, such as at Loki.
Lava flows represent another major volcanic terrain on Io. Magma erupts onto the surface from vents on the floor of paterae or on the plains from fissures, producing inflated, compound lava flows similar to those seen at Kilauea in Hawaii. Images from the Galileo spacecraft revealed that many of Io’s major lava flows, like those at Prometheus and Amirani, are produced by the build-up of small breakouts of lava flows on top of older flows. Larger outbreaks of lava have also been observed on Io. For example, the leading edge of the Prometheus flow moved 75 to 95 km (47 to 59 mi) between Voyager in 1979 and the first Galileo observations in 1996. A major eruption in 1997 produced more than 3,500 km2 (1,400 sq mi) of fresh lava and flooded the floor of the adjacent Pillan Patera.
Analysis of the Voyager images led scientists to believe that these flows were composed mostly of various compounds of molten sulfur. However, subsequent Earth-based infrared studies and measurements from the Galileo spacecraft indicate that these flows are composed of basaltic lava with mafic to ultramafic compositions. This hypothesis is based on temperature measurements of Io’s “hotspots”, or thermal-emission locations, which suggest temperatures of at least 1300 K and some as high as 1600 K. Initial estimates suggesting eruption temperatures approaching 2000 K have since proven to be overestimates because the wrong thermal models were used to model the temperatures.
The discovery of plumes at the volcanoes Pele and Loki were the first sign that Io is geologically active. Generally, these plumes are formed when volatiles like sulfur and sulfur dioxide are ejected skyward from Io’s volcanoes at speeds reaching 1 km/s (0.62 mi/s), creating umbrella-shaped clouds of gas and dust. Additional material that might be found in these volcanic plumes include sodium, potassium, and chlorine. These plumes appear to be formed in one of two ways. Io’s largest plumes, such as those emitted by Pele, are created when dissolved sulfur and sulfur dioxide gas are released from erupting magma at volcanic vents or lava lakes, often dragging silicate pyroclastic material with them. These plumes form red (from the short-chain sulfur) and black (from the silicate pyroclastics) deposits on the surface. Plumes formed in this manner are among the largest observed at Io, forming red rings more than 1,000 km (620 mi) in diameter. Examples of this plume type include Pele, Tvashtar, and Dazhbog. Another type of plume is produced when encroaching lava flows vaporize underlying sulfur dioxide frost, sending the sulfur skyward. This type of plume often forms bright circular deposits consisting of sulfur dioxide. These plumes are often less than 100 km (62 mi) tall, and are among the most long-lived plumes on Io. Examples include Prometheus, Amirani, and Masubi. The erupted sulfurous compounds are concentrated in the upper crust from a decrease in sulfur solubility at greater depths in Io’s lithosphere and can be a determinant for the eruption style of a hot spot.
Io has 100 to 150 mountains. These structures average 6 km (4 mi) in height and reach a maximum of 17.5 ± 1.5 km (10.9 ± 0.9 mi) at South Boösaule Montes. Mountains often appear as large (the average mountain is 157 km or 98 mi long), isolated structures with no apparent global tectonic patterns outlined, in contrast to the case on Earth. To support the tremendous topography observed at these mountains requires compositions consisting mostly of silicate rock, as opposed to sulfur.
Despite the extensive volcanism that gives Io its distinctive appearance, nearly all its mountains are tectonic structures, and are not produced by volcanoes. Instead, most Ionian mountains form as the result of compressive stresses on the base of the lithosphere, which uplift and often tilt chunks of Io’s crust through thrust faulting. The compressive stresses leading to mountain formation are the result of subsidence from the continuous burial of volcanic materials. The global distribution of mountains appears to be opposite that of volcanic structures; mountains dominate areas with fewer volcanoes and vice versa. This suggests large-scale regions in Io’s lithosphere where compression (supportive of mountain formation) and extension (supportive of patera formation) dominate. Locally, however, mountains and paterae often abut one another, suggesting that magma often exploits faults formed during mountain formation to reach the surface.
Mountains on Io (generally, structures rising above the surrounding plains) have a variety of morphologies. Plateaus are most common. These structures resemble large, flat-topped mesas with rugged surfaces. Other mountains appear to be tilted crustal blocks, with a shallow slope from the formerly flat surface and a steep slope consisting of formerly sub-surface materials uplifted by compressive stresses. Both types of mountains often have steep scarpsalong one or more margins. Only a handful of mountains on Io appear to have a volcanic origin. These mountains resemble small shield volcanoes, with steep slopes (6–7°) near a small, central caldera and shallow slopes along their margins. These volcanic mountains are often smaller than the average mountain on Io, averaging only 1 to 2 km (0.6 to 1.2 mi) in height and 40 to 60 km (25 to 37 mi) wide. Other shield volcanoes with much shallower slopes are inferred from the morphology of several of Io’s volcanoes, where thin flows radiate out from a central patera, such as at Ra Patera.
Nearly all mountains appear to be in some stage of degradation. Large landslide deposits are common at the base of Ionian mountains, suggesting that mass wasting is the primary form of degradation. Scalloped margins are common among Io’s mesas and plateaus, the result of sulfur dioxide sapping from Io’s crust, producing zones of weakness along mountain margins.
Io has an extremely thin atmosphere consisting mainly of sulfur dioxide (SO
2), with minor constituents including sulfur monoxide (SO), sodium chloride (NaCl), and atomic sulfur and oxygen. The atmosphere has significant variations in density and temperature with time of day, latitude, volcanic activity, and surface frost abundance. The maximum atmospheric pressure on Io ranges from 3.3 × 10−5 to 3 × 10−4 pascals (Pa) or 0.3 to 3 nbar, spatially seen on Io’s anti-Jupiter hemisphere and along the equator, and temporally in the early afternoon when the temperature of surface frost peaks. Localized peaks at volcanic plumes have also been seen, with pressures of 5 × 10−4 to 40 × 10−4 Pa (5 to 40 nbar). Io’s atmospheric pressure is lowest on Io’s night side, where the pressure dips to 0.1 × 10−7 to 1 × 10−7 Pa (0.0001 to 0.001 nbar). Io’s atmospheric temperature ranges from the temperature of the surface at low altitudes, where sulfur dioxide is in vapor pressure equilibrium with frost on the surface, to 1800 K at higher altitudes where the lower atmospheric density permits heating from plasma in the Io plasma torus and from Joule heating from the Io flux tube. The low pressure limits the atmosphere’s effect on the surface, except for temporarily redistributing sulfur dioxide from frost-rich to frost-poor areas, and to expand the size of plume deposit rings when plume material re-enters the thicker dayside atmosphere. The thin Ionian atmosphere also means any future landing probes sent to investigate Io will not need to be encased in an aeroshell-style heatshield, but instead require retrothrusters for a soft landing. The thin atmosphere also necessitates a rugged lander capable of enduring the strong Jovian radiation, which a thicker atmosphere would attenuate.
Gas in Io’s atmosphere is stripped by Jupiter’s magnetosphere, escaping to either the neutral cloud that surrounds Io, or the Io plasma torus, a ring of ionized particles that shares Io’s orbit but co-rotates with the magnetosphere of Jupiter. Approximately one ton of material is removed from the atmosphere every second through this process so that it must be constantly replenished. The most dramatic source of SO
2 are volcanic plumes, which pump 104kg of sulfur dioxide per second into Io’s atmosphere on average, though most of this condenses back onto the surface. Much of the sulfur dioxide in Io’s atmosphere sustained by sunlight-driven sublimation of SO
2 frozen on the surface. The day-side atmosphere is largely confined to within 40° of the equator, where the surface is warmest and most active volcanic plumes reside. A sublimation-driven atmosphere is also consistent with observations that Io’s atmosphere is densest over the anti-Jupiter hemisphere, where SO
2 frost is most abundant, and is densest when Io is closer to the Sun. However, some contributions from volcanic plumes are required as the highest observed densities have been seen near volcanic vents. Because the density of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere is tied directly to surface temperature, Io’s atmosphere partially collapses at night, or when Io is in the shadow of Jupiter (with an ~80% drop in column density). The collapse during eclipse is limited somewhat by the formation of a diffusion layer of sulfur monoxide in the lowest portion of the atmosphere, but the atmosphere pressure of Io’s nightside atmosphere is two to four orders of magnitude less than at its peak just past noon. The minor constituents of Io’s atmosphere, such as NaCl, SO, O, and S derive either from: direct volcanic outgassing; photodissociation, or chemical breakdown caused by solar ultraviolet radiation, from SO
2; or the sputtering of surface deposits by charged particles from Jupiter’s magnetosphere.
Various researchers have proposed that the atmosphere of Io freezes onto the surface when it passes into the shadow of Jupiter. Evidence for this is a “post-eclipse brightening”, where the moon sometimes appears a bit brighter as if covered with frost immediately after eclipse. After about 15 minutes the brightness returns to normal, presumably because the frost has disappeared through sublimation. Besides being seen through ground-based telescopes, post-eclipse brightening was found in near-infrared wavelengths using an instrument aboard the Cassini spacecraft. Further support for this idea came in 2013 when the Gemini Observatory was used to directly measure the collapse of Io’s SO
2 atmosphere during, and its reformation after, eclipse with Jupiter.
High-resolution images of Io acquired when Io is experiencing an eclipse reveal an aurora-like glow. As on Earth, this is due to particle radiation hitting the atmosphere, though in this case the charged particles come from Jupiter’s magnetic field rather than the solar wind. Aurorae usually occur near the magnetic poles of planets, but Io’s are brightest near its equator. Io lacks an intrinsic magnetic field of its own; therefore, electrons traveling along Jupiter’s magnetic field near Io directly impact Io’s atmosphere. More electrons collide with its atmosphere, producing the brightest aurora, where the field lines are tangent to Io (i.e. near the equator), because the column of gas they pass through is longest there. Aurorae associated with these tangent points on Io are observed to rock with the changing orientation of Jupiter’s tilted magnetic dipole. Fainter aurora from oxygen atoms along the limb of Io (the red glows in the image at right), and sodium atoms on Io’s night-side (the green glows in the same image) have also been observed.
- Blue, Jennifer (9 November 2009). “Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers”. USGS.
- EYE-oh, or as Greek: Ἰώ
- Thomas, P. C.; et al. (1998). “The Shape of Io from Galileo Limb Measurements”. Icarus. 135 (1): 175–180. Bibcode:1998Icar..135..175T. doi:10.1006/icar.1998.5987.
- Yeomans, Donald K. (13 July 2006). “Planetary Satellite Physical Parameters”. JPL Solar System Dynamics.
- Showman, Adam P.; Malhotra, Renu (October 1999). “The Galilean Satellites”. Science. 286 (5437): 77–84. doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.77. PMID 10506564.
- “Classic Satellites of the Solar System”. Observatorio ARVAL. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2007.
- Rathbun, J. A.; Spencer, J.R.; Tamppari, L.K.; Martin, T.Z.; Barnard, L.; Travis, L.D. (2004). “Mapping of Io’s thermal radiation by the Galileo photopolarimeter-radiometer (PPR) instrument”. Icarus. 169 (1): 127–139. Bibcode:2004Icar..169..127R. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.021.
- Rosaly MC Lopes (2006). “Io: The Volcanic Moon”. In Lucy-Ann McFadden; Paul R. Weissman; Torrence V. Johnson. Encyclopedia of the Solar System. Academic Press. pp. 419–431. ISBN 978-0-12-088589-3.
- Lopes, R. M. C.; et al. (2004). “Lava lakes on Io: Observations of Io’s volcanic activity from Galileo NIMS during the 2001 fly-bys”. Icarus. 169 (1): 140–174. Bibcode:2004Icar..169..140L. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.11.013.
- Schenk, P.; et al. (2001). “The Mountains of Io: Global and Geological Perspectives from Voyager and Galileo“. Journal of Geophysical Research. 106 (E12): 33201–33222. Bibcode:2001JGR…10633201S. doi:10.1029/2000JE001408.
- “2000 February 29, SPS 1020 (Introduction to Space Sciences)”. CSUFresno.edu. 29 February 2000. Archived from the original on 20 September 2009.
- Marius, S. (1614). Mundus Iovialis anno M.DC.IX Detectus Ope Perspicilli Belgici [The World of Jupiter discovered in the year 1609 by Means of a Belgian spy-glass].
- Marius, S. (1614). “Mundus Iovialis anno M.DC.IX Detectus Ope Perspicilli Belgici”. (in which he attributes the suggestion to Johannes Kepler)
- Marazzini, Claudio (2005). “I nomi dei satelliti di Giove: da Galileo a Simon Marius” [The names of the satellites of Jupiter: from Galileo to Simon Marius]. Lettere Italiane. 57 (3): 391–407. JSTOR 26267017.
- “Io: Overview”. NASA. Retrieved 5 March 2012.
- Barnard, E. E. (1894). “On the Dark Poles and Bright Equatorial Belt of the First Satellite of Jupiter”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 54 (3): 134–136. Bibcode:1894MNRAS..54..134B. doi:10.1093/mnras/54.3.134.
- Barnard, E. E. (1891). “Observations of the Planet Jupiter and his Satellites during 1890 with the 12-inch Equatorial of the Lick Observatory”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 51 (9): 543–556. Bibcode:1891MNRAS..51..543B. doi:10.1093/mnras/51.9.543.
- Blue, Jennifer. “Categories for Naming Features on Planets and Satellites”. U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
- Blue, Jennifer (14 June 2007). “Io Nomenclature Table of Contents”. U.S. Geological Survey. Archived from the originalon 29 June 2007.
- Cruikshank, D. P.; Nelson, R. M. (2007). “A history of the exploration of Io”. In Lopes, R. M. C.; Spencer, J. R. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 5–33. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- Van Helden, Albert (14 January 2004). “The Galileo Project / Science / Simon Marius”. Rice University.
- Baalke, Ron. “Discovery of the Galilean Satellites”. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 7 January 2010.
- O’Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (February 1997). “Longitude and the Académie Royale”. University of St. Andrews. Retrieved 14 June 2007.
- Dobbins, T.; Sheehan, W. (2004). “The Story of Jupiter’s Egg Moons”. Sky & Telescope. 107 (1): 114–120.
- Minton, R. B. (1973). “The Red Polar Caps of Io”. Communications of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory. 10: 35–39. Bibcode:1973CoLPL..10…35M.
- Lee, T. (1972). “Spectral Albedos of the Galilean Satellites”. Communications of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory. 9 (3): 179–180. Bibcode:1972CoLPL…9..179L.
- Fanale, F. P.; et al. (1974). “Io: A Surface Evaporite Deposit?”. Science. 186 (4167): 922–925. Bibcode:1974Sci…186..922F. doi:10.1126/science.186.4167.922. PMID 17730914.
- Bigg, E. K. (1964). “Influence of the Satellite Io on Jupiter’s Decametric Emission”. Nature. 203 (4949): 1008–1010. Bibcode:1964Natur.203.1008B. doi:10.1038/2031008a0.
- Fimmel, R. O.; et al. (1977). “First into the Outer Solar System”. Pioneer Odyssey. NASA. Retrieved 5 June 2007.
- Anderson, J. D.; et al. (1974). “Gravitational parameters of the Jupiter system from the Doppler tracking of Pioneer 10”. Science. 183 (4122): 322–323. Bibcode:1974Sci…183..322A. doi:10.1126/science.183.4122.322. PMID 17821098.
- “Pioneer 11 Images of Io”. Galileo Home Page. Retrieved 21 April 2007.
- “Voyager Mission Description”. NASA PDS Rings Node. 19 February 1997.
- Smith, B. A.; et al. (1979). “The Jupiter system through the eyes of Voyager 1”. Science. 204 (4396): 951–972. Bibcode:1979Sci…204..951S. doi:10.1126/science.204.4396.951. PMID 17800430.
- “Jupiter moon shows color, erosion signs”. The Milwaukee Sentinel. United Press International. 6 March 1979. p. 2.
- Morabito, L. A.; et al. (1979). “Discovery of currently active extraterrestrial volcanism“. Science. 204 (4396): 972. Bibcode:1979Sci…204..972M. doi:10.1126/science.204.4396.972. PMID 17800432.
- Strom, R. G.; et al. (1979). “Volcanic eruption plumes on Io”. Nature. 280 (5725): 733–736. Bibcode:1979Natur.280..733S. doi:10.1038/280733a0.
- Peale, S. J.; et al. (1979). “Melting of Io by Tidal Dissipation”. Science. 203 (4383): 892–894. Bibcode:1979Sci…203..892P. doi:10.1126/science.203.4383.892. PMID 17771724.
- Soderblom, L. A.; et al. (1980). “Spectrophotometry of Io: Preliminary Voyager 1 results”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 7 (11): 963–966. Bibcode:1980GeoRL…7..963S. doi:10.1029/GL007i011p00963.
- Pearl, J. C.; et al. (1979). “Identification of gaseous SO
2 and new upper limits for other gases on Io”. Nature. 288 (5725): 757–758. Bibcode:1979Natur.280..755P. doi:10.1038/280755a0.
- Broadfoot, A. L.; et al. (1979). “Extreme ultraviolet observations from Voyager 1 encounter with Jupiter”. Science. 204 (4396): 979–982. Bibcode:1979Sci…204..979B. doi:10.1126/science.204.4396.979. PMID 17800434.
- Strom, R. G.; Schneider, N. M. (1982). “Volcanic eruptions on Io”. In Morrison, D. Satellites of Jupiter. University of Arizona Press. pp. 598–633. ISBN 0-8165-0762-7.
- Anderson, J. D.; et al. (1996). “Galileo Gravity Results and the Internal Structure of Io”. Science. 272 (5262): 709–712. Bibcode:1996Sci…272..709A. doi:10.1126/science.272.5262.709. PMID 8662566.
- McEwen, A. S.; et al. (1998). “High-temperature silicate volcanism on Jupiter’s moon Io”. Science. 281 (5373): 87–90. Bibcode:1998Sci…281…87M. doi:10.1126/science.281.5373.87. PMID 9651251.
- Perry, J.; et al. (2007). “A Summary of the Galileo mission and its observations of Io”. In Lopes, R. M. C.; Spencer, J. R. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 35–59. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- Porco, C. C.; et al. (2003). “Cassini imaging of Jupiter’s atmosphere, satellites, and rings”. Science. 299 (5612): 1541–1547. Bibcode:2003Sci…299.1541P. doi:10.1126/science.1079462. PMID 12624258.
- Marchis, F.; et al. (2005). “Keck AO survey of Io global volcanic activity between 2 and 5 μm”. Icarus. 176 (1): 96–122. Bibcode:2005Icar..176…96M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.12.014.
- Spencer, John (23 February 2007). “Here We Go!”. Planetary.org. Archived from the original on 29 August 2007.
- Spencer, J. R.; et al. (2007). “Io Volcanism Seen by New Horizons: A Major Eruption of the Tvashtar Volcano”. Science. 318 (5848): 240–243. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..240S. doi:10.1126/science.1147621. PMID 17932290.
- Jonathan Amos (2 May 2012). “Esa selects 1bn-euro Juice probe to Jupiter”. BBC News.
- JUICE assessment study report (Yellow Book), ESA, 2012
- McEwen, A. S.; Turtle, E. P.; IVO Team (2015). The Io Volcano Observer (IVO) for Discovery 2015 (PDF). 46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 16–20 March 2015. The Woodlands, Texas. Abstract #1627.
- Lopes, R. M. C.; Williams, D. A. (2005). “Io after Galileo“. Reports on Progress in Physics. 68 (2): 303–340. Bibcode:2005RPPh…68..303L. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/2/R02.
- Spencer, J. “John Spencer’s Astronomical Visualizations”. Retrieved 25 May 2007.
- “Io: Overview”. Solar System Exploration. NASA. Retrieved 29 October 2014.
- Schneider, N. M.; Bagenal, F. (2007). “Io’s neutral clouds, plasma torus, and magnetospheric interactions”. In Lopes, R. M. C.; Spencer, J. R. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 265–286. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- Postberg, F.; et al. (2006). “Composition of jovian dust stream particles”. Icarus. 183 (1): 122–134. Bibcode:2006Icar..183..122P. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.02.001.
- Burger, M. H.; et al. (1999). “Galileo’s close-up view of Io sodium jet”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 (22): 3333–3336. Bibcode:1999GeoRL..26.3333B. doi:10.1029/1999GL003654.
- Krimigis, S. M.; et al. (2002). “A nebula of gases from Io surrounding Jupiter”. Nature. 415 (6875): 994–996. Bibcode:2002Natur.415..994K. doi:10.1038/415994a. PMID 11875559.
- Medillo, M.; et al. (2004). “Io’s volcanic control of Jupiter’s extended neutral clouds”. Icarus. 170 (2): 430–442. Bibcode:2004Icar..170..430M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.03.009.
- Grün, E.; et al. (1993). “Discovery of Jovian dust streams and interstellar grains by the ULYSSES spacecraft”. Nature. 362(6419): 428–430. Bibcode:1993Natur.362..428G. doi:10.1038/362428a0.
- Zook, H. A.; et al. (1996). “Solar Wind Magnetic Field Bending of Jovian Dust Trajectories”. Science. 274 (5292): 1501–1503. Bibcode:1996Sci…274.1501Z. doi:10.1126/science.274.5292.1501. PMID 8929405.
- Grün, E.; et al. (1996). “Dust Measurements During Galileo’s Approach to Jupiter and Io Encounter”. Science. 274 (5286): 399–401. Bibcode:1996Sci…274..399G. doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.399.
- Kerr, R. A. (2010). “Magnetics Point to Magma ‘Ocean’ at Io”. Science. 327 (5964): 408–409. doi:10.1126/science.327.5964.408-b. PMID 20093451.
- Schubert, J.; et al. (2004). “Interior composition, structure, and dynamics of the Galilean satellites.”. In F. Bagenal; et al. Jupiter: The Planet, Satellites, and Magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press. pp. 281–306. ISBN 978-0-521-81808-7.
- Anderson, J. D.; et al. (2001). “Io’s gravity field and interior structure”. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E12): 32963–32969. Bibcode:2001JGR…10632963A. doi:10.1029/2000JE001367.
- Kivelson, M. G.; et al. (2001). “Magnetized or Unmagnetized: Ambiguity persists following Galileo’s encounters with Io in 1999 and 2000”. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (A11): 26121–26135. Bibcode:2001JGR…10626121K. doi:10.1029/2000JA002510.
- Sohl, F.; et al. (2002). “Implications from Galileo observations on the interior structure and chemistry of the Galilean satellites”. Icarus. 157 (1): 104–119. Bibcode:2002Icar..157..104S. doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6828.
- Kuskov, O. L.; Kronrod, V. A. (2001). “Core sizes and internal structure of the Earth’s and Jupiter’s satellites”. Icarus. 151 (2): 204–227. Bibcode:2001Icar..151..204K. doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6611.
- Moore, W. B.; et al. (2007). “The Interior of Io.”. In R. M. C. Lopes; J. R. Spencer. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 89–108. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- “NASA’s Galileo Reveals Magma ‘Ocean’ Beneath Surface of Jupiter’s Moon”. Science Daily. 12 May 2011.
- Perry, J. (21 January 2010). “Science: Io’s Induced Magnetic Field and Mushy Magma Ocean”. The Gish Bar Times.
- Jaeger, W. L.; et al. (2003). “Orogenic tectonism on Io”. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (E8): 12–1. Bibcode:2003JGRE..108.5093J. doi:10.1029/2002JE001946.
- Yoder, C. F.; et al. (1979). “How tidal heating in Io drives the Galilean orbital resonance locks”. Nature. 279 (5716): 767–770. Bibcode:1979Natur.279..767Y. doi:10.1038/279767a0.
- Lainey, V.; et al. (2009). “Strong tidal dissipation in Io and Jupiter from astrometric observations”. Nature. 459: 957–959. Bibcode:2009Natur.459..957L. doi:10.1038/nature08108. PMID 19536258.
- Moore, W. B. (August 2003). “Tidal heating and convection in Io”. Journal of Geophysical Research. 108 (E8): 5096. Bibcode:2003JGRE..108.5096M. doi:10.1029/2002JE001943.
- Steigerwald, William (10 September 2015). “Underground Magma Ocean Could Explain Io’s ‘Misplaced’ Volcanoes”. NASA. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
- Tyler, Robert H.; Henning, Wade G.; Hamilton, Christopher W. (June 2015). “Tidal Heating in a Magma Ocean within Jupiter’s Moon Io”. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 218 (2). 22. Bibcode:2015ApJS..218…22T. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/22.
- Lewin, Sarah (14 September 2015). “Magma Oceans on Jupiter’s Moon Io May Solve Volcano Mystery”. Space.com. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
- “Cassini Finds Global Ocean in Saturn’s Moon Enceladus”. NASA / Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 15 September 2015. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
- Britt, Robert Roy (16 March 2000). “Pizza Pie in the Sky: Understanding Io’s Riot of Color”. Space.com. Archived from the original on 18 August 2000.
- Calder, Nigel (2005). Magic Universe: A Grand Tour of Modern Science. Oxford University Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-19-280669-7.
- Carlson, R. W.; et al. (2007). “Io’s surface composition”. In Lopes, R. M. C.; Spencer, J. R. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 194–229. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- Spencer, J.; et al. (2000). “Discovery of Gaseous S
2 in Io’s Pele Plume”. Science. 288 (5469): 1208–1210. Bibcode:2000Sci…288.1208S. doi:10.1126/science.288.5469.1208. PMID 10817990.
- Douté, S.; et al. (2004). “Geology and activity around volcanoes on Io from the analysis of NIMS”. Icarus. 169 (1): 175–196. Bibcode:2004Icar..169..175D. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.02.001.
- Seeds, Michael A.; Backman, Dana E. (2012). The Solar System (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 514. ISBN 9781133713685.
- Hadhazy, Adam (6 March 2014). “Alien Moons Could Bake Dry from Young Gas Giants’ Hot Glow”. Astrobiology Magazine. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- Radebaugh, D.; et al. (2001). “Paterae on Io: A new type of volcanic caldera?”. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E12): 33005–33020. Bibcode:2001JGR…10633005R. doi:10.1029/2000JE001406.
- Keszthelyi, L.; et al. (2004). “A Post-Galileo view of Io’s Interior”. Icarus. 169 (1): 271–286. Bibcode:2004Icar..169..271K. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.01.005.
- Williams, David; Radebaugh, Jani; Keszthelyi, Laszlo P.; McEwen, Alfred S.; Lopes, Rosaly M. C.; Douté, Sylvain; Greeley, Ronald (2002). “Geologic mapping of the Chaac-Camaxtli region of Io from Galileo imaging data”. Journal of Geophysical Research. 107 (E9): 5068. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5068W. doi:10.1029/2001JE001821.
- Moore, Patrick, ed. (2002). Astronomy Encyclopedia. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 232. ISBN 0-19-521833-7.
- Perry, J. E.; et al. (2003). Gish Bar Patera, Io: Geology and Volcanic Activity, 1997–2001 (PDF). LPSC XXXIV. Clear Lake City (Greater Houston). Abstract #1720.
- Radebaugh, J.; et al. (2004). “Observations and temperatures of Io’s Pele Patera from Cassini and Galileo spacecraft images”. Icarus. 169 (1): 65–79. Bibcode:2004Icar..169…65R. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.10.019.
- Howell, R. R.; Lopes, R. M. C. (2007). “The nature of the volcanic activity at Loki: Insights from Galileo NIMS and PPR data”. Icarus. 186 (2): 448–461. Bibcode:2007Icar..186..448H. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.09.022.
- “Juno mission captures images of volcanic plumes on Jupiter’s moon Io”. Southwest Research Institute. 31 December 2018. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
- Keszthelyi, L.; et al. (2001). “Imaging of volcanic activity on Jupiter’s moon Io by Galileo during the Galileo Europa Mission and the Galileo Millennium Mission”. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E12): 33025–33052. Bibcode:2001JGR…10633025K. doi:10.1029/2000JE001383.
- Battaglia, Steven M. (March 2019). A Jökulhlaup-like Model for Secondary Sulfur Flows on Io. 50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 18–22 March 2019. The Woodlands, Texas. Bibcode:2019LPI….50.1189B. LPI Contribution No. 1189.
- Keszthelyi, L.; et al. (2007). “New estimates for Io eruption temperatures: Implications for the interior”. Icarus. 192 (2): 491–502. Bibcode:2007Icar..192..491K. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07.008.
- Roesler, F. L.; Moos, H. W.; Oliversen, R. J.; Woodward, Jr., R. C.; Retherford, K. D.; et al. (January 1999). “Far-Ultraviolet Imaging Spectroscopy of Io’s Atmosphere with HST/STIS”. Science. 283 (5400): 353–357. Bibcode:1999Sci…283..353R. doi:10.1126/science.283.5400.353. PMID 9888844.
- Geissler, P. E.; McEwen, A. S.; Ip, W.; Belton, M. J. S.; Johnson, T. V.; et al. (August 1999). “Galileo Imaging of Atmospheric Emissions from Io”. Science. 285 (5429): 870–874. Bibcode:1999Sci…285..870G. doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.870. PMID 10436151.
- McEwen, A. S.; Soderblom, L. A. (August 1983). “Two classes of volcanic plume on Io”. Icarus. 55 (2): 197–226. Bibcode:1983Icar…55..191M. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(83)90075-1.
- Battaglia, Steven M.; Stewart, Michael A.; Kieffer, Susan W. (June 2014). “Io’s theothermal (sulfur) – Lithosphere cycle inferred from sulfur solubility modeling of Pele’s magma supply”. Icarus. 235: 123–129. Bibcode:2014Icar..235..123B. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.03.019.
- Battaglia, Steven M. (March 2015). Io: The role of Sulfide Droplet Nucleation in Pele-Type Volcanism. 46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 16–20 March 2015. The Woodlands, Texas. Bibcode:2015LPI….46.1044B. LPI Contribution No. 1832.
- Battaglia, Steven M. (March 2018). Does Io have a Lopsided Asthenosphere? Insights from Katla’s Magma Plumbing System, Iceland. 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 19–23 March 2018. The Woodlands, Texas. Bibcode:2018LPI….49.1047B. LPI Contribution No. 1047.
- Clow, G. D.; Carr, M. H. (1980). “Stability of sulfur slopes on Io”. Icarus. 44 (2): 268–279. Bibcode:1980Icar…44..268C. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(80)90022-6.
- Schenk, P. M.; Bulmer, M. H. (1998). “Origin of mountains on Io by thrust faulting and large-scale mass movements”. Science. 279 (5356): 1514–1517. Bibcode:1998Sci…279.1514S. doi:10.1126/science.279.5356.1514. PMID 9488645.
- McKinnon, W. B.; et al. (2001). “Chaos on Io: A model for formation of mountain blocks by crustal heating, melting, and tilting”. Geology. 29 (2): 103–106. Bibcode:2001Geo….29..103M. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0103:COIAMF>2.0.CO;2.
- Tackley, P. J. (2001). “Convection in Io’s asthenosphere: Redistribution of nonuniform tidal heating by mean flows”. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E12): 32971–32981. Bibcode:2001JGR…10632971T. doi:10.1029/2000JE001411.
- Schenk, P. M.; Wilson, R. R.; Davies, A. G. (2004). “Shield volcano topography and the rheology of lava flows on Io”. Icarus. 169 (1): 98–110. Bibcode:2004Icar..169…98S. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.01.015.
- Moore, J. M.; et al. (2001). “Landform degradation and slope processes on Io: The Galileo view”. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E12): 33223–33240. Bibcode:2001JGR…10633223M. doi:10.1029/2000JE001375.
- Lellouch, E.; et al. (2007). “Io’s atmosphere”. In Lopes, R. M. C.; and Spencer, J. R. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 231–264. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- Walker, A. C.; et al. (2010). “A Comprehensive Numerical Simulation of Io’s Sublimation-Driven Atmosphere”. Icarus. in. press (1): 409–432. Bibcode:2010Icar..207..409W. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.012.
- Spencer, A. C.; et al. (2005). “Mid-infrared detection of large longitudinal asymmetries in Io’s SO
2 atmosphere”. Icarus. 176 (2): 283–304. Bibcode:2005Icar..176..283S. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.01.019.
- Geissler, P. E.; Goldstein, D. B. (2007). “Plumes and their deposits”. In Lopes, R. M. C.; Spencer, J. R. Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 163–192. ISBN 3-540-34681-3.
- Moullet, A.; et al. (2010). “Simultaneous mapping of SO2, SO, NaCl in Io’s atmosphere with the Submillimeter Array”. Icarus. in. press (1): 353–365. Bibcode:2010Icar..208..353M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.02.009.
- Feaga, L. M.; et al. (2009). “Io’s dayside SO
2 atmosphere”. Icarus. 201 (2): 570–584. Bibcode:2009Icar..201..570F. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.029.
- Spencer, John (8 June 2009). “Aloha, Io”. The Planetary Society Blog. The Planetary Society.
- Tsang, C. C. C.; Spencer, J. R.; Lellouch, E.; Lopez-Valverde, M. A.; Richter, M. J. (2 August 2016). “The collapse of Io’s primary atmosphere in Jupiter eclipse”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 121: 1400–1410. Bibcode:2016JGRE..121.1400T. doi:10.1002/2016JE005025.
- Moore, C. H.; et al. (2009). “1-D DSMC simulation of Io’s atmospheric collapse and reformation during and after eclipse”. Icarus. 201 (2): 585–597. Bibcode:2009Icar..201..585M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.006.
- Fanale, F. P.; et al. (June 1981). “Io: Could SO
2condensation/sublimation cause the somtimes reported post-eclipse brightening?”. Geophysical Research Letters. 8 (6): 625–628. Bibcode:1981GeoRL…8..625F. doi:10.1029/GL008i006p00625.
- Nelson, Robert M.; et al. (February 1993). “The Brightness of Jupiter’s Satellite Io Following Emergence from Eclipse: Selected Observations, 1981–1989”. Icarus. 101 (2): 223–233. Bibcode:1993Icar..101..223N. doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1020.
- Veverka, J.; et al. (July 1981). “Voyager search for posteclipse brightening on Io”. Icarus. 47 (1): 60–74. Bibcode:1981Icar…47…60V. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(81)90091-9.
- Secosky, James J.; Potter, Michael (September 1994). “A Hubble Space Telescope study of posteclipse brightening and albedo changes on Io”. Icarus. 111 (1): 73–78. Bibcode:1994Icar..111…73S. doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1134.
- Bellucci, Giancarlo; et al. (November 2004). “Cassini/VIMS observation of an Io post-eclipse brightening event”. Icarus. 172(1): 141–148. Bibcode:2004Icar..172..141B. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.05.012.
- Crowe, Robert (2 August 2016). “SwRI Space Scientists Observe Io’s Atmospheric Collapse During Eclipse”. Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
- Tsang, Constantine C. C.; et al. (August 2016). “The collapse of Io’s primary atmosphere in Jupiter eclipse”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 121 (8): 1400–1410. Bibcode:2016JGRE..121.1400T. doi:10.1002/2016JE005025.
- Retherford, K. D.; et al. (2000). “Io’s Equatorial Spots: Morphology of Neutral UV Emissions”. J. Geophys. Res. 105(A12): 27, 157–27, 165. Bibcode:2000JGR…10527157R. doi:10.1029/2000JA002500.